Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Rip Off Theology: All Alphabet Israelite Camps are British Israel Theology Cults

Black Hebrew Israelites have literally reverse engineered and plagiarized the following doctrines from the belief systems below.


1. Reformed theology(Calvinism)


2. Christian Identity(The White Identity Church of Jesus Christ Christian ~ W.I.C.J.C.)


3. British Israelism


4. Hebrew Roots Movement

After careful comparison of the primary doctrines one can conclude with no doubt that such teachings were funneled into a spiritually racist black soteriology.(God only saved black people aka israelites). Professing Hebrews grow their theology not by study but by para-siting established theological positions and parroting what they themselves do not yet understand. Ironically, the men behind these established belief systems are who they would call "Esau".
But for now observe the cases below.


Rationalwiki States the following:


"Practically a mirror image of British Israelism and just as stupid in that regard. The more extreme adherents of Black Hebrew Israelism venture into black supremacy, racism and anti-Semitism essentially acting as a black version of the white Christian Identity movement. While the anti-Semitism, which includes claims that whites and Jews are the spawn of the Devil, and that white people will be slaves in the Kingdom of Heaven, may seem particularly odd, it parallels the Christian Identity claims about current Jews not being real Jews with one "explanation" invoking the Khazar myth."


History leaves clear and unapologetic trails of these two "Black and White" false doctrinal movements both began by men who copied their beliefs from prior existing belief systems. observe the following:

The White Identity Church of Jesus Christ Christian.
Black Hebrew Israelites
(mainly one west type camps)
A man named Wesley Swift 
in mid 1940s california started the White Identity Church of Jesus Christ Christian.
(W.I.C.J.C.)  

III. CHRISTIAN IDENTITY
Christian Identity is an ideology which asserts that the white Aryan race is God’s chosen race and that whites comprise the ten lost tribes of Israel. [19] There is no single document that expresses this belief system. Adherents refer to the Bible to justify their racist ideals. Interpreting the Book of Genesis, Christian Identity followers assert that Adam was preceded by other, lesser races, identified as “the beasts of the field” (Gen. 1:25). Eve was seduced by the snake (Satan) and gave birth to two seed lines: Cain, the direct descendent of Satan and Eve, and Able, who was of good Aryan stock through Adam. Cain then became the progenitor of the Jews in his subsequent matings with the non-Adamic races. Christian Identity adherents believe the Jews are predisposed to carry on a conspiracy against the Adamic seed line and today have achieved almost complete control of the earth. [20] This is referred to as the two-seedline doctrine, which provides Christian Identity followers with a "biblical justification" 
for hatred.

The roots of the Christian Identity movement can be traced back to British-Israelism, the conviction that the British are the lineal descendants of the “ten lost tribes” of Israel. It is a belief that existed for some time before it became a movement in the second half of the 19th century. The writings of John Wilson helped to extend the idea of British-Israelism to Anglo-Israelism, which included other Teutonic peoples -- mostly northern European peoples from Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland. British-Israelism was brought to America in the early part of the 1920s, where it remained decentralized until the 1930s. At that time, the movement underwent the final transformation to become what we know as Christian Identity, at which time its ties to the original English movement were cut and it became distinctly American.

Wesley Swift is considered the single most significant figure in the early years of the Christian Identity movement in the United States. He popularized it in the right-wing by “combining British-Israelism, a demonic anti-Semitism, and political extremism.” [21] He founded his own church in California in the mid 1940s where he could preach this ideology. In addition, he had a daily radio broadcast in California during the 1950s and 60s, through which he was able to proclaim his ideology to a large audience. With Swift’s efforts, the message of his church spread, leading to the creation of similar churches throughout the country. In 1957, the name of his church was changed to The Church of Jesus Christ Christian, which is used today by Aryan Nations (AN) churches.
- https://www.cesnur.org/testi/FBI_006.htm



A man named Abba Bivens in 1960s Harlem started the Israeli School of Universal Practical Knowledge (ISU.P.K.) group. 


VI. BLACK HEBREW ISRAELITES
As the millennium approaches, radical fringe members of the Black Hebrew Israelite (BHI) movement may pose a challenge for law enforcement. As with the adherents of most apocalyptic philosophies, certain segments of the BHI movement have the potential to engage in violence at the turn of the century. This movement has been associated with extreme acts of violence in the recent past, and current intelligence from a variety of sources indicates that extreme factions of BHI groups are preparing for a race war to close the millennium.

Violent BHI followers can generally be described as proponents of an extreme form of black supremacy. Drawing upon the teachings of earlier BHI adherents, such groups hold that blacks represent God’s true “chosen people,” while condemning whites as incarnate manifestations of evil. As God’s “authentic” Jews, BHI adherents believe that mainstream Jews are actually imposters. Such beliefs bear a striking resemblance to the Christian Identity theology practiced by many white supremacists. In fact, Tom Metzger, renowned white supremacist[Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1970s], once remarked, “They’re the black counterpart of us.” [28] Like their Christian Identity counterparts, militant BHI followers tend to see themselves as divinely endowed by God with superior status. As a result, some followers of this belief system hold that violence, including murder, is justifiable in the eyes of God, provided that it helps to rid the world of evil. Violent BHI groups are of particular concern as the millennium approaches because they believe in the inevitability of a race war between blacks and whites.

The extreme elements of the BHI movement are prone to engage in violent activity. As seen in previous convictions of BHI followers, adherents of this philosophy have a proven history of violence, and several indications point toward a continuation of this trend. Some BHI followers have been observed in public donning primarily black clothing, with emblems and/or patches bearing the “Star of David” symbol. Some BHI members practice paramilitary operations and wear web belts and shoulder holsters. Some adherents have extensive criminal records for a variety of violations, including weapons charges, assault, drug trafficking, and fraud.
- https://www.cesnur.org/testi/FBI_006.htm 





Below are unreleased powerpoints that i made for a visual comparison, followed by underlined quotations from british israelism doctrinal books. Most ironic, the pages selected show British Israelists(Began in 1640s) claiming that some Jews were actually gentiles.

PLAGIARIZED BREAKDOWNS OF BRITISH ISRAELISM ADAPTED BY ABBA BIVENS AND ONE WEST SCHOOLS. http://www.iapsop.com/…/1903__bell___british-israel_bible_n…

BRITISH ISRAEL BIBLE NOTES 1903




























 

In short, why would anyone desire to be a part of a movement so theologically ironic and hypocritical as the black hebrew israelite movement since its theology was inspired by "Esau"???... Something to think about...

Friday, February 15, 2019

Were apostate Israelites ever referred to as Gentiles?

In the book of Hosea, specifically chapters 1 and 2, there are passages that professing Hebrews often use to lay the false belief that the Israelites, specifically the Northern Kingdom in this case, were scattered and rejected by God to the point that it made them gentiles. This is the ground of reason that they make the claim of the gentiles in the new testament being lost Israelites and descendants of the Northern Kingdom.

But were they ever actually called gentiles for their apostasy and sin? The Following is and answer to this question from a brilliant wife and mother, Sister Beatrice Wells. Note how this is proven in the old covenant ironically.

________________________________________________________________


"The problem that those who appeal to the Books of Maccabees to defend the position that those who took on Greek Culture are called "Gentiles" or "Greeks" is that neither of the Books of Maccabees describe those people in that way. The books of Maccabees always makes a distinction between "Gentiles/"Greeks" and Jews who had joined with the Greeks by referring to them as:  "lawless" "renegades" "ungodly" or "sinners." They never called them "Gentiles/Greeks". In some places "Gentiles" and "lawless" or "sinful men" are found in the same passage. The NT makes the same distinction when mentioning Zaccheus. He was called a "sinner" for working for the Roman government, but never a Gentile. The following are examples of this from the book of Maccabees:

The question of the adoption of the Greek polytheism was first raised in Judaea by apostate Jews themselves. Lawless men, παράνομοι "


1 Mac 1:11 NRSV
11 In those days certain renegades came out from Israel and misled many, saying, “Let us go and make a covenant with the Gentiles around us,   *(Gentiles are mentioned in the same passage)

KJV
11 In those days went there out of Israel wicked men, who persuaded many, saying, Let us go and make a covenant with the heathen that are round about us

1 Mac 6:21. NRSV
21 But some of the garrison escaped from the siege and some of the ungodly Israelites joined them.

KJV
21 Howbeit certain of them that were besieged got forth, unto whom some ungodly men of Israel joined themselves:


1 Mac 7:5 NRSV
5 Then there came to him all the renegade and godless men of Israel; they were led by Alcimus, who wanted to be high priest

KJV
5 There came unto him all the wicked and ungodly men of Israel, having Alcimus, who was desirous to be high priest, for their captain

1 Mac 9:25. NRSV

25 Bacchides chose the godless and put them in charge of the country

KJV
25 Then Bacchides chose the wicked men, and made them lords of the country

1 Mac 10:61 NRSV

61 A group of malcontents from Israel, renegades, gathered together against him to accuse him; but the king paid no attention to them


KJV
61 At that time certain pestilent fellows of Israel, men of a wicked life, assembled themselves against him, to accuse



"Even Israelites who were described as hating their own nation were not called Gentiles/Greeks:"



1 Mac 11:21 NRSV
21 But certain renegades who hated their nation went to the king and reported to him that Jonathan was besieging the citadel.  

KJV
21 Then came ungodly persons, who hated their own people, went unto the king, and told him that Jonathan besieged the tower

1 Mac 11:25
25 Although certain renegades of his nation kept making complaints against him

KJV
25 And though certain ungodly men of the people had made complaints against him,



"A Traitor to the Law and His Country:"


2 Mac 5:15 NRSV
guided by Menelaus, who had become a traitor both to the laws and to his country

KJV
15 Yet was he not content with this, but presumed to go into the most holy temple of all the world; Menelaus, that traitor to the laws, and to his own country, being his guide


"To Ssoreal's point:  The following shows that those who had become uncircumcised were "recovered" and were  circumcised again: Even these uncircumcised Jews were never called Gentiles/Greeks: They were called:  "sinners", "fugitives". "renegades". Gentiles are mentioned in the same passage and as you can see they make a distinction between the two groups of men in the same way that the
NT does."


1 Mac 2:42–48. NRSV

42 Then there united with them a company of Hasideans, mighty warriors of Israel, all who offered themselves willingly for the law. 43 And all who became fugitives to escape their troubles joined them and reinforced them. 44 They organized an army, and struck down sinners in their anger and renegades in their wrath; the survivors fled to the Gentiles for safety. 45 And Mattathias and his friends went around and tore down the altars; 46 they forcibly circumcised all the uncircumcised boys that they found within the borders of Israel. 47 They hunted down the arrogant, and the work prospered in their hands. 48 They rescued the law out of the hands of the Gentiles and kings, and they never let the sinner gain the upper hand.  

KJV
44 So they joined their forces, and smote sinful men in their anger, and wicked men in their wrath: but the rest fled to the heathen for succour. 45 Then Mattathias and his friends went round about, and pulled down the altars: 46 And what children soever they found within the coast of Israel uncircumcised, those they circumcised valiantly. 47 They pursued also after the proud men, and the work prospered in their hand. 48 So they recovered the law out of the hand of the Gentiles, and out of the hand of kings, neither suffered they the sinner to triumph.



So in summary they were called, "lawless men" "sinners", "fugitives", "renegades" and I'm sure plenty more things but never were they called Gentiles. And when they repented and returned to Judaism they were were acknowledged as "recovered"......

Not a single passage in the new testament describes gentiles as ones having returned or recovered to the faith... The only verse you see that states such a return is the unbelieving Jews who come to Jesus and thereby become "grafted back in to their own olive tree" in Romans 11 where there was a distinction between believing Jews, believing gentiles, and unbelieving Jews, NOT "lost Israelites called gentiles". This false doctrine was stolen by the black Hebrew Israelites from the actual books in THE BRITISH ISRAELISM CULT.